[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221110141302.GB2404288@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 06:13:02 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] thermal/core: Ensure that thermal device is
registered in thermal_zone_get_temp
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[ ... ]
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
> > index c65cdce8f856..3bac0b7a4c62 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_helpers.c
> > @@ -115,7 +115,12 @@ int thermal_zone_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
> > int ret;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
> > + if (!device_is_registered(&tz->device)) {
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto unlock;
> > + }
> > ret = __thermal_zone_get_temp(tz, temp);
> > +unlock:
>
> I would do it this way:
>
> if (device_is_registered(&tz->device))
> ret = __thermal_zone_get_temp(tz, temp);
> else
> ret = -ENODEV;
>
Done in all patches. Agreed, that looks much better.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists