linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 04/13] zram: Introduce recompress sysfs knob

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y20NAX4R6RgRpWnE@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 23:38:57 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
        Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 04/13] zram: Introduce recompress sysfs knob

On (22/11/10 23:31), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (22/11/10 06:09), Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> [..]
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c:1894:10: note: initialize the variable 'err' to silence this warning
> >                 int err;
> >                        ^
> >                         = 0
> > 7 errors generated.
> > 
> > Is the fix just to initialize err to 0 as it suggests or should there be
> > a different fix?
> 
> Yes, that's the correct fix. Thanks for catching this. We had "err = 0"
> in v4 of this patch set, but it somehow didn't make it to v5.

Nathan, I just sent a simple one-liner patch. If you don't mind,
may we ask Andrew to take it as a fixup (folded) patch?