[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221110014821.1548347-1-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 01:48:19 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Use page-track only for... page tracking
Don't bounce through the page-track notifier when zapping+flushing SPTEs
in response to memslot changes as the need to zap+flush isn't strictly
limited to page-tracking. With that done, register KVM's notifier on the
first allocation of a shadow root, as KVM's ->track_write() hook is used
only to react to writes to gPTEs.
Aside from avoiding a RETPOLINE on emulated writes, dropping KVM's internal
use will allow removing ->track_flush_slot() altogether once KVM-GT moves
to a different hook[*]. Tracking "flushes" of slots is a poor fit for
KVM-GT's needs as KVM-GT needs to drop its write-protection only when a
memslot change is guaranteed to be committed, whereas the "flush" call is
speculative in the sense that KVM may abort a memslot update after flushing
the original memslot.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221108084416.11447-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com
Sean Christopherson (2):
KVM: x86/mmu: Don't rely on page-track mechanism to flush on memslot
change
KVM: x86/mmu: Register page-tracker on first shadow root allocation
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
base-commit: d663b8a285986072428a6a145e5994bc275df994
--
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists