| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTRoeog55EMEZeziLxX0QNxD_pjBh979y8zp6sVwdarNpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:51:03 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: anup@...infault.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, heiko@...ech.de,
philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] riscv: asid: Fixup stale TLB entry cause application crash
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 5:45 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 12:40:56AM -0500, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > After use_asid_allocator is enabled, the userspace application will
> > crash by stale TLB entries. Because only using cpumask_clear_cpu without
> > local_flush_tlb_all couldn't guarantee CPU's TLB entries were fresh.
> > Then set_mm_asid would cause the user space application to get a stale
> > value by stale TLB entry, but set_mm_noasid is okay.
> >
> > Here is the symptom of the bug:
> > unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 (coredump)
> > 0x0000003fd6d22524 <+4>: auipc s0,0x70
> > 0x0000003fd6d22528 <+8>: ld s0,-148(s0) # 0x3fd6d92490
> > => 0x0000003fd6d2252c <+12>: ld a5,0(s0)
> > (gdb) i r s0
> > s0 0x8082ed1cc3198b21 0x8082ed1cc3198b21
> > (gdb) x /2x 0x3fd6d92490
> > 0x3fd6d92490: 0xd80ac8a8 0x0000003f
> > The core dump file shows that register s0 is wrong, but the value in
> > memory is correct. Because 'ld s0, -148(s0)' used a stale mapping entry
> > in TLB and got a wrong result from an incorrect physical address.
> >
> > When the task ran on CPU0, which loaded/speculative-loaded the value of
> > address(0x3fd6d92490), then the first version of the mapping entry was
> > PTWed into CPU0's TLB.
> > When the task switched from CPU0 to CPU1 (No local_tlb_flush_all here by
> > asid), it happened to write a value on the address (0x3fd6d92490). It
> > caused do_page_fault -> wp_page_copy -> ptep_clear_flush ->
> > ptep_get_and_clear & flush_tlb_page.
> > The flush_tlb_page used mm_cpumask(mm) to determine which CPUs need TLB
> > flush, but CPU0 had cleared the CPU0's mm_cpumask in the previous
> > switch_mm. So we only flushed the CPU1 TLB and set the second version
> > mapping of the PTE. When the task switched from CPU1 to CPU0 again, CPU0
> > still used a stale TLB mapping entry which contained a wrong target
> > physical address. It raised a bug when the task happened to read that
> > value.
> >
> > The solution is to keep all CPUs' footmarks of cpumask(mm) in switch_mm,
> > which could prevent losing pieces of stuff during TLB flush.
> >
> > Fixes: 65d4b9c53017 ("RISC-V: Implement ASID allocator")
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Fixup nommu compile problem (Thx Conor, Also Reported-by: kernel
> > test robot <lkp@...el.com>)
> > - Keep cpumask_clear_cpu for noasid
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> > index 7acbfbd14557..f58e4b211595 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> > @@ -317,7 +317,11 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> > */
> > cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >
> > - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator))
> > +#endif
>
> That's not very pretty. Can't we just do the following, instead?
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> index 7acbfbd14557..ace419761e31 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
> @@ -16,10 +16,11 @@
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator);
Define use_asid_allocator in nommu part? How about:
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
index 7acbfbd14557..ed3f8de7ef97 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c
@@ -205,12 +205,16 @@ static void set_mm_noasid(struct mm_struct *mm)
local_flush_tlb_all();
}
-static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
+static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
+ struct mm_struct *next, unsigned int cpu)
{
- if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator))
- set_mm_asid(mm, cpu);
- else
- set_mm_noasid(mm);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) {
+ set_mm_asid(next, cpu);
+ } else {
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
+ set_mm_noasid(next);
+ }
}
static int __init asids_init(void)
@@ -264,7 +268,8 @@ static int __init asids_init(void)
}
early_initcall(asids_init);
#else
-static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
+static inline void set_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
+ struct mm_struct *next, unsigned int cpu)
{
/* Nothing to do here when there is no MMU */
}
@@ -317,10 +322,7 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct
mm_struct *next,
*/
cpu = smp_processor_id();
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
-
- set_mm(next, cpu);
+ set_mm(prev, next, cpu);
flush_icache_deferred(next, cpu);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> +
> static unsigned long asid_bits;
> static unsigned long num_asids;
> static unsigned long asid_mask;
>
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
> > + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
> > +
> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
> >
> > set_mm(next, cpu);
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
Powered by blists - more mailing lists