[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXtq67krGy++7y+x7jOTerZYpCfcJEY+nMpW=otGx8bSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 17:17:29 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, prabhakar.csengg@...il.com,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, magnus.damm@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, heiko@...ech.de,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, guoren@...nel.org,
anup@...infault.org, Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, biju.das.jz@...renesas.com,
prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Add support for Renesas RZ/Five SoC
Hi Conor,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 10:21 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 11:55:24AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:59:14 PDT (-0700), prabhakar.csengg@...il.com wrote:
> > > Lad Prabhakar (7):
> > > dt-bindings: riscv: Sort the CPU core list alphabetically
> > > dt-bindings: riscv: Add Andes AX45MP core to the list
> > > riscv: Kconfig.socs: Add ARCH_RENESAS kconfig option
> > > riscv: dts: renesas: Add initial devicetree for Renesas RZ/Five SoC
> > > riscv: dts: renesas: Add minimal DTS for Renesas RZ/Five SMARC EVK
> > > MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Renesas RISC-V
> > > riscv: configs: defconfig: Enable Renesas RZ/Five SoC
>
> > Geert was mentioning taking these though one of his trees, that works for me
> > so
> >
> > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Series queued in renesas-devel for v6.2, spread across a few existing
and new branches to be pulled by soc, taking into account dependencies.
> > Happy to do a shared tag or whatever, but I think we can just skip that
> > here. The only conflicts would be defconfig and Kconfig.socs, but I don't
> > think anything big is in the works for either -- unless Conor was planning
> > on re-spinning that Kconfig.socs rework?
>
> Uh, nah. I've got a wee bit (the removal of selects) that is "ready" but
> there's zero urgency so it can wait for after v6.2-rc1. I don't think
> it'd conflict anyway. The rest of it I need to sort out a v1 of, but I've
> been distracted. Should be safe to take the defconfig & Kconfig.socs stuff
> in terms of me doing anything.
>
> Geert, would you be able to apply the first two patches on top of
> v6.1-rc1 just in case, as you mentioned previously, it needs to become
> part of a shared branch? Seems unlikely at this point in the cycle
> though.
The bindings are in the existing renesas-dt-bindings-for-v6.2 branch,
which is based on v6.1-rc1, and only had RZ/Five related commits anyway.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists