linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] media: ov2740: Remove duplicative pointer in struct nvm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 17:29:16 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
        Shawn Tu <shawnx.tu@...el.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] media: ov2740: Remove duplicative pointer in
 struct nvm_data

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:58:45PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:08:48PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:05:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 05:10:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 03:05:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > The struct i2c_client pointer is used only to get driver data,
> > > > > associated with a struct device or print messages on behalf.
> > > > > Moreover, the very same pointer to a struct device is already
> > > > > assigned by a regmap and can be retrieved from there.
> > > > > No need to keep a duplicative pointer.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks, Bungbu, for the review. Can it be now applied?
> > > 
> > > Don't see this being applied or commented why not...
> > > 
> > > Mauro? Or who is taking care of this driver nowadays?
> > 
> > Okay, found a private response by Mauro where he tells that Sakari can take
> > care of this. Sakari, should I resend this to you with all tags applied?
> > Or you can use `b4` tool that allows to avoid unneeded resend.
> 
> No need to. But please cc me on the next time. I'll take a look now...

How should I know whom to Cc? Can we update MAINTAINERS accordingly, please?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko