linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 2/3] Documentation: KUnit: reword description of assertions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:29:05 -0800
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com
Cc:     rmoar@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] Documentation: KUnit: reword description of assertions

The existing wording implies that kunit_kmalloc_array() is "the method
under test". We're actually testing the sort() function in that example.
This is because the example was changed in commit 953574390634
("Documentation: KUnit: Rework writing page to focus on writing tests"),
but the wording was not.

Also add a `note` telling people they can use the KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ()
macros from any function. Some users might be coming from a framework
like gUnit where that'll compile but silently do the wrong thing.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi@...gle.com>
---
 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index b0a6c3bc0eeb..22416ebb94ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -112,11 +112,14 @@ terminates the test case if the condition is not satisfied. For example:
 			KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, a[i], a[i + 1]);
 	}
 
-In this example, the method under test should return pointer to a value. If the
-pointer returns null or an errno, we want to stop the test since the following
-expectation could crash the test case. `ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(...)` allows us
-to bail out of the test case if the appropriate conditions are not satisfied to
-complete the test.
+In this example, we need to be able to allocate an array to test the ``sort()``
+function. So we use ``KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL()`` to abort the test if
+there's an allocation error.
+
+.. note::
+   In other test frameworks, ``ASSERT`` macros are often implemented by calling
+   ``return`` so they only work from the test function. In KUnit, we stop the
+   current kthread on failure, so you can call them from anywhere.
 
 Customizing error messages
 --------------------------
-- 
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog