[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 12:41:29 -0800
From: "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <hdegoede@...hat.com>, <markgross@...nel.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
<ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, <thiago.macieira@...el.com>,
<athenas.jimenez.gonzalez@...el.com>, <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Use generic microcode
headers and functions
On 11/11/2022 8:23 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 02:53:18PM -0800, Jithu Joseph wrote:
>> static int scan_chunks_sanity_check(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> - int metadata_size, curr_pkg, cpu, ret = -ENOMEM;
>> struct ifs_data *ifsd = ifs_get_data(dev);
>> + int curr_pkg, cpu, ret = -ENOMEM;
>> bool *package_authenticated;
>> struct ifs_work local_work;
>> - char *test_ptr;
>>
>> package_authenticated = kcalloc(topology_max_packages(), sizeof(bool), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!package_authenticated)
>> return ret;
>
> Bah, how big is that thing so that you can't simply do a bitfield on the
> stack here instead of kcalloc-ing?
Will modify it to use individual bits from a u32 to store package authentication status.
>
>> @@ -203,67 +174,33 @@ static int scan_chunks_sanity_check(struct device *dev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static int ifs_sanity_check(struct device *dev,
>> - const struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header)
>> +static int ifs_image_sanity_check(struct device *dev, const struct microcode_header_intel *data)
>
> Yet another static function - no need for the ifs_ prefix.
Noted ... will change
Jithu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists