linux-kernel - [patch 04/20] genirq/irqdomain: Provide IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:56:43 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
        Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: [patch 04/20] genirq/irqdomain: Provide IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_PARENT

The new PCI/IMS (Interrupt Message Store) functionality is allowing
hardware vendors to provide implementation specific storage for the MSI
messages. This can be device memory and also host/guest memory, e.g. in
queue memory which is shared with the hardware.

This requires device specific MSI interrupt domains, which cannot be
achived by expanding the existing PCI/MSI interrupt domain concept which is
a global interrupt domain shared by all PCI devices on a particular (IOMMU)
segment:

                                         |--- device 1
     [Vector]---[Remapping]---[PCI/MSI]--|...
                                         |--- device N

This works because the PCI/MSI[-X] space is uniform, but falls apart with
PCI/IMS which is implementation defined and must be available along with
PCI/MSI[-X] on the same device.

To support PCI/MSI[-X] plus PCI/IMS on the same device it is required to
rework the PCI/MSI interrupt domain hierarchy concept in the following way:

                              |--- [PCI/MSI] device 1
     [Vector]---[Remapping]---|...
                              |--- [PCI/MSI] device N

That allows in the next step to create multiple interrupt domains per device:


                              |--- [PCI/MSI] device 1
                              |--- [PCI/IMS] device 1
     [Vector]---[Remapping]---|...
                              |--- [PCI/MSI] device N
                              |--- [PCI/IMS] device N

So the domain which previously created the global PCI/MSI domain must now
act as parent domain for the per device domains.

The hierarchy depth is the same as before, but the PCI/MSI domains are then
device specific and not longer global.

Provide IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_PARENT, which allows to identify these parent
domains, along with helpers to query it.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 include/linux/irqdomain.h |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ enum {
 	/* Irq domain doesn't translate anything */
 	IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_NO_MAP		= (1 << 6),
 
+	/* Irq domain is a MSI parent domain */
+	IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_PARENT	= (1 << 8),
+
 	/*
 	 * Flags starting from IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_NONCORE are reserved
 	 * for implementation specific purposes and ignored by the
@@ -551,6 +554,11 @@ static inline bool irq_domain_is_msi_rem
 
 extern bool irq_domain_hierarchical_is_msi_remap(struct irq_domain *domain);
 
+static inline bool irq_domain_is_msi_parent(struct irq_domain *domain)
+{
+	return domain->flags & IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_PARENT;
+}
+
 #else	/* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY */
 static inline int irq_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain,
 			unsigned int nr_irqs, int node, void *arg)
@@ -596,6 +604,12 @@ irq_domain_hierarchical_is_msi_remap(str
 {
 	return false;
 }
+
+static inline bool irq_domain_is_msi_parent(struct irq_domain *domain)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif	/* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY */
 
 #else /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */