linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] genirq: Remove unused parameter force of irq_set_affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 12 Nov 2022 02:06:43 +0000
From:   Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] genirq: Remove unused parameter force of
 irq_set_affinity_deactivated()

Hi tglx.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2022 2:11 AM
> To: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Remove unused parameter force of
> irq_set_affinity_deactivated()
> 
> On Fri, Oct 07 2022 at 18:32, Angus Chen wrote:
> > The force parameter in irq_set_affinity_deactivated() is not used,
> > get rid of it.
> 
> Correct.
> 
> > Fixes: baedb87d1b53 ("genirq/affinity: Handle affinity setting on
> > inactive interrupts correctly")
> 
> What does this fix? An unused argument is neither a bug nor a
> problem. Removing it is a cleanup nothing else.
> 
Thank you for your reply.
I almost forget this patch because it just a cleanup.
I thought maybe it is too simple to submit,
so it be ignored by maintainer.
Can I send a v2 to modify the git log ?
Thanks.
> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx