[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <TY2PR06MB34244F5E7353682050F6B90785039@TY2PR06MB3424.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 02:06:43 +0000
From: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] genirq: Remove unused parameter force of
irq_set_affinity_deactivated()
Hi tglx.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2022 2:11 AM
> To: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Remove unused parameter force of
> irq_set_affinity_deactivated()
>
> On Fri, Oct 07 2022 at 18:32, Angus Chen wrote:
> > The force parameter in irq_set_affinity_deactivated() is not used,
> > get rid of it.
>
> Correct.
>
> > Fixes: baedb87d1b53 ("genirq/affinity: Handle affinity setting on
> > inactive interrupts correctly")
>
> What does this fix? An unused argument is neither a bug nor a
> problem. Removing it is a cleanup nothing else.
>
Thank you for your reply.
I almost forget this patch because it just a cleanup.
I thought maybe it is too simple to submit,
so it be ignored by maintainer.
Can I send a v2 to modify the git log ?
Thanks.
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists