[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3DmSfdG9ZeV8inu@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 14:42:49 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
michael@...le.cc, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] regmap-irq: Add handle_mask_sync() callback
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 08:55:51PM -0500, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> Provide a public callback handle_mask_sync() that drivers can use when
> they have more complex IRQ masking logic. The default implementation is
> regmap_irq_handle_mask_sync(), used if the chip doesn't provide its own
> callback.
...
> + * @handle_mask_sync: Callback used to handle IRQ mask syncs. The index will be
> + * in the range [0, num_regs[
Not sure if it's a typo ([ vs. ]), but if you want to say "not including the
last", use mathematical notation, i.e. "[0, num_regs)".
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists