[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3Bjy8UlZXdpWMYn@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 19:26:03 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: masahiroy@...nel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, eugene.loh@...cle.com,
kris.van.hees@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] kallsyms: add /proc/kallmodsyms for text symbol
disambiguation
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 01:41:31PM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote:
> This helps disambiguate symbols with identical names when some are in
> built-in modules are some are not, but if symbols are still ambiguous,
> {object file names} are added as needed to disambiguate them.
*Why* would we ever want to trouble ourselves with expanding all this
data into the kernel? The commit log does a poor effort to describe
any value-add doing this could ever have.
> I am not wedded to the name or format of /proc/kallmodsyms, but felt it
> best to split it out of /proc/kallsyms to avoid breaking existing
> kallsyms parsers.
I'd like much more review from other parties other than Oracle on this then.
If this is generally useful, I'd image interested parties would be raving
about all this but so far I don't see it. Please try to engage folks
outside of Oracle.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists