[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3JivLcvbHNcIcSB@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 07:46:04 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/9] livepatch: Improve the search performance of
module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol()
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 02:26:19PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> I'll check on that, meanwhile if we could keep the module argument,
> that'd be great
As Leizhen suggested I could just drop patches:
7/9 livepatch: Improve the search performance of module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol()
8/9 kallsyms: Delete an unused parameter related to kallsyms_on_each_symbol()
Then after the next kernel is released this can be relooked at.
If this is agreeable let me know.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists