[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221114125031.19f8330c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:50:31 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] timers: Add timer_shutdown_sync() to be called
before freeing timers
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:16:31 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> And honestly, for that to happen I'd be perfectly happy with something like
>
> #define timer_shutdown(t) del_timer(t)
> #define timer_shutdown_sync(t) del_timer_sync(t)
>
> (obviously with the patches that first remove the existing
> 'timer_shutdown()' uses first). That wouldn't introduce the *new*
> semantics, but it would at least allow the different subsystems to do
> the obvious cases, and let the networking people wonder about the much
> less obvious ones.
I can create the above series, if Thomas is OK with this approach.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists