| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:37:46 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] LoongArch: Simulate branch and PC instructions
Hi, Tiezhu,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 8:50 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> According to LoongArch Reference Manual, simulate branch and
> PC instructions, this is preparation for later patch.
>
> Link: https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-Vol1-EN.html#branch-instructions
> Link: https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-Vol1-EN.html#_pcaddi_pcaddu121_pcaddu18l_pcalau12i
>
> Co-developed-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h | 19 ++++++
> arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h | 1 +
> arch/loongarch/kernel/inst.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> index fce1843..93d5cd4 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/inst.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <asm/asm.h>
> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
>
> #define INSN_BREAK 0x002a0000
>
> @@ -28,6 +29,8 @@ enum reg0i26_op {
> enum reg1i20_op {
> lu12iw_op = 0x0a,
> lu32id_op = 0x0b,
> + pcaddi_op = 0x0c,
> + pcalau12i_op = 0x0d,
> pcaddu12i_op = 0x0e,
> pcaddu18i_op = 0x0f,
> };
> @@ -313,6 +316,12 @@ static inline bool is_branch_ins(union loongarch_instruction *ip)
> ip->reg1i21_format.opcode <= bgeu_op;
> }
>
> +static inline bool is_pc_ins(union loongarch_instruction *ip)
> +{
> + return ip->reg1i20_format.opcode >= pcaddi_op &&
> + ip->reg1i20_format.opcode <= pcaddu18i_op;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool is_ra_save_ins(union loongarch_instruction *ip)
> {
> /* st.d $ra, $sp, offset */
> @@ -334,6 +343,16 @@ static inline bool is_stack_alloc_ins(union loongarch_instruction *ip)
> u32 larch_insn_gen_lu32id(enum loongarch_gpr rd, int imm);
> u32 larch_insn_gen_lu52id(enum loongarch_gpr rd, enum loongarch_gpr rj, int imm);
> u32 larch_insn_gen_jirl(enum loongarch_gpr rd, enum loongarch_gpr rj, unsigned long pc, unsigned long dest);
> +void simu_branch(struct pt_regs *regs, union loongarch_instruction insn);
> +void simu_pc(struct pt_regs *regs, union loongarch_instruction insn);
> +
> +static inline unsigned long sign_extended(unsigned long val, unsigned int idx)
> +{
> + if (val & (1UL << idx))
> + return ~((1UL << (idx + 1)) - 1) | val;
> + else
> + return ((1UL << (idx + 1)) - 1) & val;
> +}
>
> static inline bool signed_imm_check(long val, unsigned int bit)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h
> index 17838c6..eb9538a 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #define _ASM_PTRACE_H
>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> +#include <asm/irqflags.h>
> #include <asm/thread_info.h>
> #include <uapi/asm/ptrace.h>
>
> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/inst.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/inst.c
> index b1df0ec..f5c1eff6 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/inst.c
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/inst.c
> @@ -38,3 +38,116 @@ u32 larch_insn_gen_jirl(enum loongarch_gpr rd, enum loongarch_gpr rj, unsigned l
>
> return insn.word;
> }
> +
> +void simu_branch(struct pt_regs *regs, union loongarch_instruction insn)
> +{
> + unsigned int imm, imm_l, imm_h, rd, rj;
> + unsigned long pc = regs->csr_era;
> +
In previous versions we checked the alignment of era in simu_branch()
and simu_pc(), now they are unnecessary?
Huacai
> + imm_l = insn.reg0i26_format.immediate_l;
> + imm_h = insn.reg0i26_format.immediate_h;
> + switch (insn.reg0i26_format.opcode) {
> + case b_op:
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended((imm_h << 16 | imm_l) << 2, 27);
> + return;
> + case bl_op:
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended((imm_h << 16 | imm_l) << 2, 27);
> + regs->regs[1] = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + imm_l = insn.reg1i21_format.immediate_l;
> + imm_h = insn.reg1i21_format.immediate_h;
> + rj = insn.reg1i21_format.rj;
> + switch (insn.reg1i21_format.opcode) {
> + case beqz_op:
> + if (regs->regs[rj] == 0)
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended((imm_h << 16 | imm_l) << 2, 22);
> + else
> + regs->csr_era = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + return;
> + case bnez_op:
> + if (regs->regs[rj] != 0)
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended((imm_h << 16 | imm_l) << 2, 22);
> + else
> + regs->csr_era = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + imm = insn.reg2i16_format.immediate;
> + rj = insn.reg2i16_format.rj;
> + rd = insn.reg2i16_format.rd;
> + switch (insn.reg2i16_format.opcode) {
> + case beq_op:
> + if (regs->regs[rj] == regs->regs[rd])
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended(imm << 2, 17);
> + else
> + regs->csr_era = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + break;
> + case bne_op:
> + if (regs->regs[rj] != regs->regs[rd])
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended(imm << 2, 17);
> + else
> + regs->csr_era = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + break;
> + case blt_op:
> + if ((long)regs->regs[rj] < (long)regs->regs[rd])
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended(imm << 2, 17);
> + else
> + regs->csr_era = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + break;
> + case bge_op:
> + if ((long)regs->regs[rj] >= (long)regs->regs[rd])
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended(imm << 2, 17);
> + else
> + regs->csr_era = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + break;
> + case bltu_op:
> + if (regs->regs[rj] < regs->regs[rd])
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended(imm << 2, 17);
> + else
> + regs->csr_era = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + break;
> + case bgeu_op:
> + if (regs->regs[rj] >= regs->regs[rd])
> + regs->csr_era = pc + sign_extended(imm << 2, 17);
> + else
> + regs->csr_era = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + break;
> + case jirl_op:
> + regs->csr_era = regs->regs[rj] + sign_extended(imm << 2, 17);
> + regs->regs[rd] = pc + LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_info("%s: unknown opcode\n", __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void simu_pc(struct pt_regs *regs, union loongarch_instruction insn)
> +{
> + unsigned long pc = regs->csr_era;
> + unsigned int rd = insn.reg1i20_format.rd;
> + unsigned int imm = insn.reg1i20_format.immediate;
> +
> + switch (insn.reg1i20_format.opcode) {
> + case pcaddi_op:
> + regs->regs[rd] = pc + sign_extended(imm << 2, 21);
> + break;
> + case pcaddu12i_op:
> + regs->regs[rd] = pc + sign_extended(imm << 12, 31);
> + break;
> + case pcaddu18i_op:
> + regs->regs[rd] = pc + sign_extended(imm << 18, 37);
> + break;
> + case pcalau12i_op:
> + regs->regs[rd] = pc + sign_extended(imm << 12, 31);
> + regs->regs[rd] &= ~((1 << 12) - 1);
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_info("%s: unknown opcode\n", __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + regs->csr_era += LOONGARCH_INSN_SIZE;
> +}
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists