[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221114180148.GC5305@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 23:31:48 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@...ux.dev>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
caihuoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 19/20] PCI: dwc: Introduce generic platform clocks and
resets
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:37:59PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:31:15PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:13:00PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > Currently almost each platform driver uses its own resets and clocks
> > > naming in order to get the corresponding descriptors. It makes the code
> > > harder to maintain and comprehend especially seeing the DWC PCIe core main
> > > resets and clocks signals set hasn't changed much for about at least one
> > > major IP-core release. So in order to organize things around these signals
> > > we suggest to create a generic interface for them in accordance with the
> > > naming introduced in the DWC PCIe IP-core reference manual:
> > >
> > > Application clocks:
> > > - "dbi" - data bus interface clock (on some DWC PCIe platforms it's
> > > referred as "pclk", "pcie", "sys", "ahb", "cfg", "iface",
> > > "gio", "reg", "pcie_apb_sys");
> > > - "mstr" - AXI-bus master interface clock (some DWC PCIe glue drivers
> > > refer to this clock as "port", "bus", "pcie_bus",
> > > "bus_master/master_bus/axi_m", "pcie_aclk");
> > > - "slv" - AXI-bus slave interface clock (also called as "port", "bus",
> > > "pcie_bus", "bus_slave/slave_bus/axi_s", "pcie_aclk",
> > > "pcie_inbound_axi").
> > >
> > > Core clocks:
> > > - "pipe" - core-PCS PIPE interface clock coming from external PHY (it's
> > > normally named by the platform drivers as just "pipe");
> > > - "core" - primary clock of the controller (none of the platform drivers
> > > declare such a clock but in accordance with the ref. manual
> > > the devices may have it separately specified);
> > > - "aux" - auxiliary PMC domain clock (it is named by some platforms as
> > > "pcie_aux" and just "aux");
> > > - "ref" - Generic reference clock (it is a generic clock source, which
> > > can be used as a signal source for multiple interfaces, some
> > > platforms call it as "ref", "general", "pcie_phy",
> > > "pcie_phy_ref").
> > >
> > > Application resets:
> > > - "dbi" - Data-bus interface reset (it's CSR interface clock and is
> > > normally called as "apb" though technically it's not APB but
> > > DWC PCIe-specific interface);
> > > - "mstr" - AXI-bus master reset (some platforms call it as "port", "apps",
> > > "bus", "axi_m");
> > > - "slv" - ABI-bus slave reset (some platforms call it as "port", "apps",
> > > "bus", "axi_s").
> > >
> > > Core resets:
> > > - "non-sticky" - non-sticky CSR flags reset;
> > > - "sticky" - sticky CSR flags reset;
> > > - "pipe" - PIPE-interface (Core-PCS) logic reset (some platforms
> > > call it just "pipe");
> > > - "core" - controller primary reset (resets everything except PMC
> > > module, some platforms refer to this signal as "soft",
> > > "pci");
> > > - "phy" - PCS/PHY block reset (strictly speaking it is normally
> > > connected to the input of an external block, but the
> > > reference manual says it must be available for the PMC
> > > working correctly, some existing platforms call it
> > > "pciephy", "phy", "link");
> > > - "hot" - PMC hot reset signal (also called as "sleep");
> > > - "pwr" - cold reset signal (can be referred as "pwr", "turnoff").
> > >
> > > Bus reset:
> > > - "perst" - PCIe standard signal used to reset the PCIe peripheral
> > > devices.
> > >
> > > As you can see each platform uses it's own naming for basically the same
> > > set of the signals. In the framework of this commit we suggest to add a
> > > set of the clocks and reset signals resources, corresponding names and
> > > identifiers for each denoted entity. At current stage the platforms will
> > > be able to use the provided infrastructure to automatically request all
> > > these resources and manipulate with them in the Host/EP init callbacks.
> > > Alas it isn't that easy to create a common cold/hot reset procedure due to
> > > too many platform-specifics in the procedure, like the external flags
> > > exposure and the delays requirement.
> > >
> >
>
> > I'm not really sure if this generification is going to help. For instance, in
> > Qcom platforms we have some required clocks and some optional clocks and that
> > too differs with each SoC. For sure you can add logic in the core dwc driver to
> > handle those cases but that starting to do that will add a pile of mess to the
> > dwc driver.
>
> It will help to place the order to the clock and reset naming, which
> in its turn will improve the driver readability and maintainability.
> Almost all the platforms get/check clocks and resets from the
> same set defined in the DW PCIe HW-manual (including the Qcom ones).
> The difference just in the names the developers used. Since the names
> is a contract (a part of the DT-bindings) which can't be changed that
> easy, we can't just update the already available drivers. But at the
> very least we can unify the DT-bindings and the resources names
> defined in there (which is already done and acked by Rob), provide a
> generic driver API and persuade the new drivers developers to be using
> the interface with already available names.
>
> As I already said many times for the last year. The clocks are mainly
> the same, but the way they are used to enable the interfaces (timings,
> order, etc) can be platform-specific. It's possible for the
> HW-designers in the framework of their platforms to re-use a
> clocks/resets generation module provided by Synopsys, but even
> Synopsys says that it's not always applicable. So practically the
> platform-designers prefer to omit the module and provide a direct
> control to the clocks and resets wires. Our platform is another
> example of such approach.
>
> Note you are still able to check whether the corresponding
> clocks/resets are available for your device just by checking the
> pointers.
>
> >
> > IMO, if the dwc driver is not going to use these clocks, like controlling the
> > clocks/resets, then there is no point in keeping the resource acquiring part in
> > it.
>
> Baikal-T1 will use these clocks and resets. The generic DWC PCIe
> Host/EP driver will provide a simple and ready-to-use API to request
> and check the clocks and resets. The new drivers will supposed to use
> it too. Thus eventually we'll get at least the modern drivers using
> the same names which will make the DW PCIe driver more readable and
> maintainable. Meanwhile the old drivers alas will have to be left
> with their platform-specific names since we can't change the
> DT-bindings.
>
> In anyway all of these has already been discussed with Rob. Here is
> what he said:
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 05:29:20PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > No doubt there is way to much variation here (ummm, Qcom!). Some
> > standardization of names in (new) bindings would be good. That's where
> > we should be defining names IMO.
>
> > On the driver side, I'd like to see the DW core handle clocks/resets/phys
> > at least for the easy cases of just turn on/off all the clocks and
> > toggle all resets. Perhaps even more minimally, move the clk/reset
> > struct pointers to the DWC core.
>
> Due to the platform-specific order and timings I don't think it's
> possible to create some generic clocks/resets enable/disable method.
> It could be done, but it will be too complex with many-platform specific
> hooks, callbacks, flags, etc. I even can't think of such interface
> even for already available drivers, not to say for some future designs.
> But the names and the handlers storage could be unified for sure.
>
> Note eventually, if anybody would be concerned about a full
> unification, the already available drivers could be converted to using
> the provided here API just on the level of the clock/reset IDs, but
> the names will have to be left as is alas.
>
> Also note my very first version of this patch provided just the clocks
> and reset names and their IDs without the corresponding resource
> request. Rob suggested to at least provide a generic request
> procedure. That's what I did in one of the subsequent patchset
> revisions.
>
Okay then. I failed to go through the previous discussions, sorry about that.
Thanks,
Mani
> -Sergey
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changelog v3:
> > > - Add a method to at least request the generic clocks and resets. (@Rob)
> > > - Add GPIO-based PERST# signal support.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 42 +++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > index d31f9d41d5cb..1e06ccf2dc9e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/align.h>
> > > #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > #include <linux/ioport.h>
> > > #include <linux/of.h>
> > > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > > @@ -20,11 +22,89 @@
> > > #include "../../pci.h"
> > > #include "pcie-designware.h"
> > >
> > > +static const char * const dw_pcie_app_clks[DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_CLKS] = {
> > > + [DW_PCIE_DBI_CLK] = "dbi",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_MSTR_CLK] = "mstr",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_SLV_CLK] = "slv",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const char * const dw_pcie_core_clks[DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_CLKS] = {
> > > + [DW_PCIE_PIPE_CLK] = "pipe",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_CORE_CLK] = "core",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_AUX_CLK] = "aux",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_REF_CLK] = "ref",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const char * const dw_pcie_app_rsts[DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_RSTS] = {
> > > + [DW_PCIE_DBI_RST] = "dbi",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_MSTR_RST] = "mstr",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_SLV_RST] = "slv",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const char * const dw_pcie_core_rsts[DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_RSTS] = {
> > > + [DW_PCIE_NON_STICKY_RST] = "non-sticky",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_STICKY_RST] = "sticky",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_CORE_RST] = "core",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_PIPE_RST] = "pipe",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_PHY_RST] = "phy",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_HOT_RST] = "hot",
> > > + [DW_PCIE_PWR_RST] = "pwr",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int dw_pcie_get_clocks(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > > +{
> > > + int i, ret;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_CLKS; i++)
> > > + pci->app_clks[i].id = dw_pcie_app_clks[i];
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_CLKS; i++)
> > > + pci->core_clks[i].id = dw_pcie_core_clks[i];
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(pci->dev, DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_CLKS,
> > > + pci->app_clks);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + return devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(pci->dev, DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_CLKS,
> > > + pci->core_clks);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int dw_pcie_get_resets(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > > +{
> > > + int i, ret;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_RSTS; i++)
> > > + pci->app_rsts[i].id = dw_pcie_app_rsts[i];
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_RSTS; i++)
> > > + pci->core_rsts[i].id = dw_pcie_core_rsts[i];
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_optional_shared(pci->dev,
> > > + DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_RSTS,
> > > + pci->app_rsts);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_optional_exclusive(pci->dev,
> > > + DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_RSTS,
> > > + pci->core_rsts);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + pci->pe_rst = devm_gpiod_get_optional(pci->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(pci->pe_rst))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(pci->pe_rst);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int dw_pcie_get_resources(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > > {
> > > struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pci->dev);
> > > struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(pci->dev);
> > > struct resource *res;
> > > + int ret;
> > >
> > > if (!pci->dbi_base) {
> > > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "dbi");
> > > @@ -62,6 +142,17 @@ int dw_pcie_get_resources(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > > if (!pci->atu_size)
> > > pci->atu_size = SZ_4K;
> > >
> > > + /* LLDD is supposed to manually switch the clocks and resets state */
> > > + if (dw_pcie_cap_is(pci, REQ_RES)) {
> > > + ret = dw_pcie_get_clocks(pci);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = dw_pcie_get_resets(pci);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (pci->link_gen < 1)
> > > pci->link_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(np);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > > index 081f169e6021..393dfb931df6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > > @@ -13,10 +13,13 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > > #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > > #include <linux/msi.h>
> > > #include <linux/pci.h>
> > > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > >
> > > #include <linux/pci-epc.h>
> > > #include <linux/pci-epf.h>
> > > @@ -45,6 +48,7 @@
> > > __dw_pcie_ver_cmp(_pci, TYPE_ ## _type, >=))
> > >
> > > /* DWC PCIe controller capabilities */
> > > +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_REQ_RES 0
> > > #define DW_PCIE_CAP_IATU_UNROLL 1
> > > #define DW_PCIE_CAP_CDM_CHECK 2
> > >
> > > @@ -233,6 +237,39 @@ enum dw_pcie_device_mode {
> > > DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +enum dw_pcie_app_clk {
> > > + DW_PCIE_DBI_CLK,
> > > + DW_PCIE_MSTR_CLK,
> > > + DW_PCIE_SLV_CLK,
> > > + DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_CLKS
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +enum dw_pcie_core_clk {
> > > + DW_PCIE_PIPE_CLK,
> > > + DW_PCIE_CORE_CLK,
> > > + DW_PCIE_AUX_CLK,
> > > + DW_PCIE_REF_CLK,
> > > + DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_CLKS
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +enum dw_pcie_app_rst {
> > > + DW_PCIE_DBI_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_MSTR_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_SLV_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_RSTS
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +enum dw_pcie_core_rst {
> > > + DW_PCIE_NON_STICKY_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_STICKY_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_CORE_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_PIPE_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_PHY_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_HOT_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_PWR_RST,
> > > + DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_RSTS
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > struct dw_pcie_host_ops {
> > > int (*host_init)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
> > > void (*host_deinit)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
> > > @@ -332,6 +369,11 @@ struct dw_pcie {
> > > int num_lanes;
> > > int link_gen;
> > > u8 n_fts[2];
> > > + struct clk_bulk_data app_clks[DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_CLKS];
> > > + struct clk_bulk_data core_clks[DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_CLKS];
> > > + struct reset_control_bulk_data app_rsts[DW_PCIE_NUM_APP_RSTS];
> > > + struct reset_control_bulk_data core_rsts[DW_PCIE_NUM_CORE_RSTS];
> > > + struct gpio_desc *pe_rst;
> > > };
> > >
> > > #define to_dw_pcie_from_pp(port) container_of((port), struct dw_pcie, pp)
> > > --
> > > 2.38.1
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists