[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3KNaZjhqJZYjxrn@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:48:09 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>
Cc: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
"Nyman, Mathias" <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] i915: Move list_count() to list.h for broader use
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 06:11:51PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
...
> So all of the non-list_for_each code appears to be an inline.
This is not true.
> This which, resembles the non-list_for_each pattern is a macro?
>
> Just curious as to why the macro rather than inline?
See above. However, I'm fine with the inline.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists