lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:48:09 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> To: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com> Cc: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>, "intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>, "Nyman, Mathias" <mathias.nyman@...el.com>, "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] i915: Move list_count() to list.h for broader use On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 06:11:51PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote: ... > So all of the non-list_for_each code appears to be an inline. This is not true. > This which, resembles the non-list_for_each pattern is a macro? > > Just curious as to why the macro rather than inline? See above. However, I'm fine with the inline. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists