lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2022 20:48:09 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>
Cc:     Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
        "intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
        "Nyman, Mathias" <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] i915: Move list_count() to list.h for broader use

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 06:11:51PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:

...

> So all of the non-list_for_each code appears to be an inline.

This is not true.

> This which, resembles the non-list_for_each pattern is a macro?
> 
> Just curious as to why the macro rather than inline?

See above. However, I'm fine with the inline.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists