| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y3K5vyWB8m/mKmZD@google.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:57:19 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Allow >1 guest mode in
access_tracking_perf_test
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:12:48PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > As the name implies, for_each_guest_mode() will run the test case for
> > all supported guest addressing modes. On x86 that doesn't amount to
> > anything, but arm64 can handle 4K, 16K, and 64K page sizes on supporting
> > hardware.
> >
> > Blindly attempting to run access_tracking_perf_test on arm64 stalls on
> > the second test case, as the 'done' global remains set between test
> > iterations. Clear it after VM teardown in anticipation of a subsequent
> > test case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> > index 76c583a07ea2..4da066479e0a 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> > @@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
> >
> > perf_test_join_vcpu_threads(nr_vcpus);
> > perf_test_destroy_vm(vm);
> > +
> > + /* Clear done in anticipation of testing another guest mode */
> > + done = false;
>
> Can we fix this in the so called "perf_test" infrastructure?
> memslot_modification_stress_test.c has the same bug just inverted (see run_vcpus).
Yeah, sounds good to me. I'll wrap your diff up in a patch here in a
bit.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c | 28 +++++--------------
> .../selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h | 3 ++
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c | 3 ++
> .../kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c | 6 +---
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> index 76c583a07ea2..786bc62a2c79 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/access_tracking_perf_test.c
> @@ -58,9 +58,6 @@ static enum {
> ITERATION_MARK_IDLE,
> } iteration_work;
>
> -/* Set to true when vCPU threads should exit. */
> -static bool done;
> -
> /* The iteration that was last completed by each vCPU. */
> static int vcpu_last_completed_iteration[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
>
> @@ -206,28 +203,20 @@ static void assert_ucall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t expected_ucall)
> expected_ucall, actual_ucall);
> }
>
> -static bool spin_wait_for_next_iteration(int *current_iteration)
> -{
> - int last_iteration = *current_iteration;
> -
> - do {
> - if (READ_ONCE(done))
> - return false;
> -
> - *current_iteration = READ_ONCE(iteration);
> - } while (last_iteration == *current_iteration);
> -
> - return true;
> -}
> -
> static void vcpu_thread_main(struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = vcpu_args->vcpu;
> struct kvm_vm *vm = perf_test_args.vm;
> int vcpu_idx = vcpu_args->vcpu_idx;
> int current_iteration = 0;
> + int last_iteration;
> +
> + while (!READ_ONCE(perf_test_args.stop_vcpus)) {
> + last_iteration = current_iteration;
> + do {
> + current_iteration = READ_ONCE(iteration);
> + } while (current_iteration == last_iteration);
>
> - while (spin_wait_for_next_iteration(¤t_iteration)) {
> switch (READ_ONCE(iteration_work)) {
> case ITERATION_ACCESS_MEMORY:
> vcpu_run(vcpu);
> @@ -321,9 +310,6 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
> mark_memory_idle(vm, nr_vcpus);
> access_memory(vm, nr_vcpus, ACCESS_READ, "Reading from idle memory");
>
> - /* Set done to signal the vCPU threads to exit */
> - done = true;
> -
> perf_test_join_vcpu_threads(nr_vcpus);
> perf_test_destroy_vm(vm);
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> index eaa88df0555a..536d7c3c3f14 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ struct perf_test_args {
> /* Run vCPUs in L2 instead of L1, if the architecture supports it. */
> bool nested;
>
> + /* Test is done, stop running vCPUs. */
> + bool stop_vcpus;
> +
> struct perf_test_vcpu_args vcpu_args[KVM_MAX_VCPUS];
> };
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> index 9618b37c66f7..ee3f499ccbd2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c
> @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ void perf_test_start_vcpu_threads(int nr_vcpus,
>
> vcpu_thread_fn = vcpu_fn;
> WRITE_ONCE(all_vcpu_threads_running, false);
> + WRITE_ONCE(perf_test_args.stop_vcpus, false);
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_vcpus; i++) {
> struct vcpu_thread *vcpu = &vcpu_threads[i];
> @@ -289,6 +290,8 @@ void perf_test_join_vcpu_threads(int nr_vcpus)
> {
> int i;
>
> + WRITE_ONCE(perf_test_args.stop_vcpus, true);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < nr_vcpus; i++)
> pthread_join(vcpu_threads[i].thread, NULL);
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c
> index bb1d17a1171b..3a5e4518307c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
> static int nr_vcpus = 1;
> static uint64_t guest_percpu_mem_size = DEFAULT_PER_VCPU_MEM_SIZE;
>
> -static bool run_vcpus = true;
> -
> static void vcpu_worker(struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = vcpu_args->vcpu;
> @@ -45,7 +43,7 @@ static void vcpu_worker(struct perf_test_vcpu_args *vcpu_args)
> run = vcpu->run;
>
> /* Let the guest access its memory until a stop signal is received */
> - while (READ_ONCE(run_vcpus)) {
> + while (!READ_ONCE(perf_test_args.stop_vcpus)) {
> ret = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
> TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "vcpu_run failed: %d\n", ret);
>
> @@ -110,8 +108,6 @@ static void run_test(enum vm_guest_mode mode, void *arg)
> add_remove_memslot(vm, p->memslot_modification_delay,
> p->nr_memslot_modifications);
>
> - run_vcpus = false;
> -
> perf_test_join_vcpu_threads(nr_vcpus);
> pr_info("All vCPU threads joined\n");
>
>
> base-commit: 10dbc57b5777e6938a648eb4a870bad448fcb6f5
> --
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists