[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3IbW5/yTWE7z0cO@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:41:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Gene Chen <gene_chen@...htek.com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] leds: deduplicate led_init_default_state_get()
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:19:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:11:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 08 Nov 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:53:49AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 04:49:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > > There are several users of LED framework that reimplement the
> > > > > > > functionality of led_init_default_state_get(). In order to
> > > > > > > deduplicate them move the declaration to the global header
> > > > > > > (patch 2) and convert users (patche 3-11).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear LED maintainers, is there any news on this series? It's hanging around
> > > > > > for almost 2 months now...
> > > > >
> > > > > My offer still stands if help is required.
> > > >
> > > > From my point of view the LED subsystem is quite laggish lately (as shown by
> > > > this patch series, for instance), which means that _in practice_ the help is
> > > > needed, but I haven't got if we have any administrative agreement on that.
> > > >
> > > > Pavel?
> > >
> > > So, Pavel seems quite unresponsive lately... Shall we just move on and take
> > > maintainership?
> >
> > I had an off-line conversation with Greg who advised me against that.
>
> OK. What the reasonable option we have then?
I thought there is now a new LED maintainer, is that not working out?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists