[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221114114344.18650-25-jirislaby@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:43:22 +0100
From: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Martin Liska <mliska@...e.cz>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 24/46] bpf, lto: mark interpreter jump table as __noreorder
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
gcc LTO has a problem that can cause static variables containing &&
labels to be put into a different LTO partition and then fail the build.
This can happen with the jump table in the BPF interprer.
Mark the interpreter function and the jump table as __noreorder, this
guarantees they both end up in the first partition.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Liska <mliska@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 25a54e04560e..d40ce00622f6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@ u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
*
* Return: whatever value is in %BPF_R0 at program exit
*/
-static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+static u64 __noreorder ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
#define BPF_INSN_2_LBL(x, y) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y] = &&x##_##y
#define BPF_INSN_3_LBL(x, y, z) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y | BPF_##z] = &&x##_##y##_##z
--
2.38.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists