[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3GlZkqhh5SbQ33Y@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 10:18:14 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>,
Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>,
Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Add PMCI driver
On 2022-11-11 at 15:16:42 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2022, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > On 2022-11-08 at 16:43:03 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
> > > +static int pmci_probe(struct dfl_device *ddev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device *dev = &ddev->dev;
> > > + struct pmci_device *pmci;
> > > +
> > > + pmci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmci), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!pmci)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + pmci->m10bmc.dev = dev;
> > > + pmci->dev = dev;
> >
> > I don't see its usage.
>
> It's used by dev_err() in patch 11/12.
I see. But is m10bmc.dev already good enough for the usage?
Thanks,
Yilun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists