[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3JF1Yb2cEe9CQCZ@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:42:45 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/14] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: register clocks sooner
On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 02:15:04PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 11/11/2022 12:24, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Runtime PM should be enabled before registering the PHYs, but there is
> > no reason that the clocks can not be registered before enabling runtime
> > PM.
>
> This will have a side effect of DP and pipe clocks not using runtime PM
> during the clocks operations (see the code handling rpm_enabled in
> drivers/clk/clk.c). If this is an intended change, it should be
> described in the commit message.
Good catch. I'll drop this one.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists