[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2211141507380.6045@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:09:00 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Bergmeier <abergmeier@....net>
cc: lains@...eup.net, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] HID: Print specific timeout error in probe
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Andreas Bergmeier wrote:
> When -ETIMEOUT gets reported ensure that the error message mentiones
> timeout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bergmeier <abergmeier@....net>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> index 20ae7f73ef08..a0c148a8df6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> @@ -4438,12 +4438,16 @@ static int hidpp_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
> if (hidpp->quirks & HIDPP_QUIRK_UNIFYING)
> hidpp_unifying_init(hidpp);
>
> - connected = hidpp_root_get_protocol_version(hidpp) == 0;
> + ret = hidpp_root_get_protocol_version(hidpp);
> + connected = ret == 0;
> atomic_set(&hidpp->connected, connected);
> if (!(hidpp->quirks & HIDPP_QUIRK_UNIFYING)) {
> if (!connected) {
> + if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> + hid_err(hdev, "Device connection timed out");
> + else
> + hid_err(hdev, "Device not connected");
> ret = -ENODEV;
> - hid_err(hdev, "Device not connected");
Printing as specific error as possible makes sense to me.
I am however wondering whether the better aproach (covering all the cases,
not just ETIMEDOUT specifically) wouldn't be to convert all the dbg_hid()
in hidpp_send_message_sync() to be proper error messages instead? That
would cover also your case, as ETIMEDOUT is handled there as well with
debugging message.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists