linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: use more appropriate NET_NAME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221115083828.06cebab1@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:38:28 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: use more appropriate NET_NAME_* constants
 for user ports

On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:43:55 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> +	if (port->name) {
> +		name = port->name;
> +		assign_type = NET_NAME_PREDICTABLE;
> +	} else {
> +		name = "eth%d";
> +		assign_type = NET_NAME_ENUM;

Per Andrew's comment lets make the change in two steps.
Which one should come first is a judgment call :)