[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221115173942.mdn2r3i6joehhohu@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:39:43 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/2] net: mscc: ocelot: remove redundant
stats_layout pointers
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 09:10:57AM -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> That should work. If there end up being 10 different struct
> ocelot_stat_layout[]s, we might reconsider... but in the foreseeable
> future there will only be two.
>
> So this applies to patch 2 of my set, which means I'll pretty much keep
> it as-is. The get_stats_layout and the ocelot_mm_stats_layout can be
> added when the 9959 stuff gets applied.
Sounds good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists