[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221115202412.77d52oafpplzu5bw@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:24:12 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: core: Refactor pwmchip_add() to avoid extra
checks
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 07:00:04PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When we already know that everything is fine there is no need
> to use ret variable. Refactor code accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
The patch is correct (i.e. doesn't change the semantic of the function).
But I think there is some more potential to clean up than it used here.
I will send out a series that I like better than this patch.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists