linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGS_qxpQVWs2RYX_+6FZS8a9-M1GocoMjHNrLBADtkGzxh8mHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:02:03 -0800
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, mauro.chehab@...ux.intel.com,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:46 PM Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com> wrote:
> > - As Daniel mentioned, can we think of a better placeholder name for
> > tests without Subtest lines? One thought is to just leave it as the
> > empty string?
>
> I am definitely open to changing this placeholder name.
>
> The ideas I thought of are: "Test suite", just "Test", or just an
> empty string. "Test" or empty string may be less confusing. What do
> people prefer?

I'd prefer the empty string.

So it would show up as something like
===== (1 subtests) =====
[PASSED] case1
====== suite1 ======

Note: we'll just have to make sure to avoid a leading space (e.g.
we're currently doing message += f' (1 subtest)' )

Daniel