linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/3] sbitmap: Try each queue to wake up at least one waiter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221115224553.23594-4-krisman@suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:45:53 -0500
From:   Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
To:     axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        liusong@...ux.alibaba.com, chaitanyak@...dia.com,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] sbitmap: Try each queue to wake up at least one waiter

Jan reported the new algorithm as merged might be problematic if the
queue being awaken becomes empty between the waitqueue_active inside
sbq_wake_ptr check and the wake up.  If that happens, wake_up_nr will
not wake up any waiter and we loose too many wake ups.  In order to
guarantee progress, we need to wake up at least one waiter here, if
there are any.  This now requires trying to wake up from every queue.

Instead of walking through all the queues with sbq_wake_ptr, this call
moves the wake up inside that function.  In a previous version of the
patch, I found that updating wake_index several times when walking
through queues had a measurable overhead.  This ensures we only update
it once, at the end.

Fixes: 4f8126bb2308 ("sbitmap: Use single per-bitmap counting to wake up queued tags")
Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
---
 lib/sbitmap.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
index bea7984f7987..586deb333237 100644
--- a/lib/sbitmap.c
+++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
@@ -560,12 +560,12 @@ void sbitmap_queue_min_shallow_depth(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_min_shallow_depth);
 
-static struct sbq_wait_state *sbq_wake_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq)
+static void __sbitmap_queue_wake_up(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, int nr)
 {
 	int i, wake_index;
 
 	if (!atomic_read(&sbq->ws_active))
-		return NULL;
+		return;
 
 	wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);
 	for (i = 0; i < SBQ_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) {
@@ -579,20 +579,22 @@ static struct sbq_wait_state *sbq_wake_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq)
 		 */
 		wake_index = sbq_index_inc(wake_index);
 
-		if (waitqueue_active(&ws->wait)) {
-			if (wake_index != atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index))
-				atomic_set(&sbq->wake_index, wake_index);
-			return ws;
-		}
+		/*
+		 * It is sufficient to wake up at least one waiter to
+		 * guarantee forward progress.
+		 */
+		if (waitqueue_active(&ws->wait) &&
+		    wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, nr))
+			break;
 	}
 
-	return NULL;
+	if (wake_index != atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index))
+		atomic_set(&sbq->wake_index, wake_index);
 }
 
 void sbitmap_queue_wake_up(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, int nr)
 {
 	unsigned int wake_batch = READ_ONCE(sbq->wake_batch);
-	struct sbq_wait_state *ws = NULL;
 	unsigned int wakeups;
 
 	if (!atomic_read(&sbq->ws_active))
@@ -604,16 +606,10 @@ void sbitmap_queue_wake_up(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq, int nr)
 	do {
 		if (atomic_read(&sbq->completion_cnt) - wakeups < wake_batch)
 			return;
-
-		if (!ws) {
-			ws = sbq_wake_ptr(sbq);
-			if (!ws)
-				return;
-		}
 	} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&sbq->wakeup_cnt,
 				     &wakeups, wakeups + wake_batch));
 
-	wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, wake_batch);
+	__sbitmap_queue_wake_up(sbq, wake_batch);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_wake_up);
 
-- 
2.35.3