[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b47b291-b1a0-ac0c-2049-b7de6545c26b@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 06:48:39 +0800
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>
To: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@...wei.com>, clm@...com,
josef@...icpanda.com, dsterba@...e.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com, yanaijie@...wei.com, wqu@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] btrfs: add might_sleep() to some places in
update_qgroup_limit_item()
On 2022/11/16 01:17, ChenXiaoSong wrote:
> As the potential sleeping under spin lock is hard to spot, we should add
> might_sleep() to some places.
>
> Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@...wei.com>
Looks good.
We may want to add more in other locations, but this is really a good start.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 ++
> fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index a9543f01184c..809053e9cfde 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -1934,6 +1934,8 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root,
> int min_write_lock_level;
> int prev_cmp;
>
> + might_sleep();
> +
> lowest_level = p->lowest_level;
> WARN_ON(lowest_level && ins_len > 0);
> WARN_ON(p->nodes[0] != NULL);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> index 9334c3157c22..d0480b9c6c86 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
> @@ -779,6 +779,8 @@ static int update_qgroup_limit_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> int ret;
> int slot;
>
> + might_sleep();
> +
> key.objectid = 0;
> key.type = BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_KEY;
> key.offset = qgroup->qgroupid;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists