[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0D3A45FE-5367-40CD-A035-37F6EE98B25E@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 23:38:32 +0000
From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"punit.agrawal@...edance.com" <punit.agrawal@...edance.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"darren@...amperecomputing.com" <darren@...amperecomputing.com>,
"yangyicong@...ilicon.com" <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>,
"huzhanyuan@...o.com" <huzhanyuan@...o.com>,
"lipeifeng@...o.com" <lipeifeng@...o.com>,
"zhangshiming@...o.com" <zhangshiming@...o.com>,
"guojian@...o.com" <guojian@...o.com>,
"realmz6@...il.com" <realmz6@...il.com>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
"openrisc@...ts.librecores.org" <openrisc@...ts.librecores.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
"wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com" <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
haoxin <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"prime.zeng@...ilicon.com" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown
during page reclamation
On Nov 14, 2022, at 7:14 PM, Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 8a497d902c16..5bd78ae55cd4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -264,7 +264,8 @@ static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm)
> }
>
> static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_mm(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch,
> - struct mm_struct *mm)
> + struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long uaddr)
Logic-wise it looks fine. I notice the “v6", and it should not be blocking,
but I would note that the name "arch_tlbbatch_add_mm()” does not make much
sense once the function also takes an address.
It could’ve been something like arch_set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending() but that’s
too long. I’m not very good with naming, but the current name is not great.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists