lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:11:33 +0800
From:   hejunhao <hejunhao3@...wei.com>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        <leo.yan@...aro.org>, <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        <john.garry@...wei.com>
CC:     <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>, <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <liuqi115@...wei.com>,
        <f.fangjian@...wei.com>, <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/2] drivers/coresight: Add UltraSoc System Memory
 Buffer driver


On 2022/11/14 21:59, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 14/11/2022 13:06, hejunhao wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2022/11/14 18:49, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2022 22:06, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>> Hi Junhao,
>>>>
>>>> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>>>>
>>>> [auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next]
>>>> [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.1-rc4 next-20221111]
>>>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a 
>>>> note.
>>>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>>>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>>>>
>>>> url: 
>>>> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Junhao-He/Add-support-for-UltraSoc-System-Memory-Buffer/20221109-215158
>>>> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git 
>>>> for-next
>>>> patch link: 
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109135008.9485-2-hejunhao3%40huawei.com
>>>> patch subject: [PATCH v12 1/2] drivers/coresight: Add UltraSoc 
>>>> System Memory Buffer driver
>>>> config: arm64-randconfig-s033-20221111
>>>> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
>>>> reproduce:
>>>>          wget 
>>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross 
>>>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>          # apt-get install sparse
>>>>          # sparse version: v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty
>>>>          # 
>>>> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/49ede03fd874b65deca5382ea84c3377188136da
>>>>          git remote add linux-review 
>>>> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>>>>          git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
>>>> Junhao-He/Add-support-for-UltraSoc-System-Memory-Buffer/20221109-215158 
>>>>
>>>>          git checkout 49ede03fd874b65deca5382ea84c3377188136da
>>>>          # save the config file
>>>>          mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>>>>          COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 
>>>> make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' 
>>>> O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/hwtracing/coresight/
>>>>
>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>>>
>>>> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:113:33: sparse: 
>>>>>> sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
>>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>>>>> sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) 
>>>>>> @@ expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>>> expected void const *
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: got 
>>>> void [noderef] __iomem *
>>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>>>>> sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) 
>>>>>> @@ expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>>> expected void const *
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: got 
>>>> void [noderef] __iomem *
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>>> sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) 
>>>> @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>>> expected void const *
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: got 
>>>> void [noderef] __iomem *
>>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:463:14: sparse: 
>>>>>> sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) 
>>>>>> @@ expected void [noderef] __iomem *base @@     got void * @@
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:463:14: sparse: 
>>>> expected void [noderef] __iomem *base
>>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:463:14: sparse: got 
>>>> void *
>>>>
>>>> vim +/__iomem +113 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c
>>>>
>>>>      89
>>>>      90    static ssize_t smb_read(struct file *file, char __user 
>>>> *data, size_t len,
>>>>      91                loff_t *ppos)
>>>>      92    {
>>>>      93        struct smb_drv_data *drvdata = 
>>>> container_of(file->private_data,
>>>>      94                        struct smb_drv_data, miscdev);
>>>>      95        struct smb_data_buffer *sdb = &drvdata->sdb;
>>>>      96        struct device *dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev;
>>>>      97        ssize_t to_copy = 0;
>>>>      98
>>>>      99        mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
>>>>     100
>>>>     101        if (!sdb->data_size) {
>>>>     102            smb_update_data_size(drvdata);
>>>>     103            if (!sdb->data_size)
>>>>     104                goto out;
>>>>     105        }
>>>>     106
>>>>     107        to_copy = min(sdb->data_size, len);
>>>>     108
>>>>     109        /* Copy parts of trace data when read pointer wrap 
>>>> around SMB buffer */
>>>>     110        if (sdb->rd_offset + to_copy > sdb->buf_size)
>>>>     111            to_copy = sdb->buf_size - sdb->rd_offset;
>>>>     112
>>>>   > 113        if (copy_to_user(data, (void *)sdb->buf_base + 
>>>> sdb->rd_offset,
>>>>     114                 to_copy)) {
>>>>     115            dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to copy data to user\n");
>>>>     116            to_copy = -EFAULT;
>>>>     117            goto out;
>>>>     118        }
>>>>     119
>>>
>>> Please could we replace this with copy_to_user_fromio() ?
>>>
>>> Suzuki
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CoreSight mailing list -- coresight@...ts.linaro.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to coresight-leave@...ts.linaro.org
>>> .
>>>
>> Hi Suzuki,
>>
>> This is a cache memory,  due to improper use of "__iomem" , the 
>> sparse generates warnings.
>> I has fix it in v13.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221114090316.63157-2-hejunhao3@huawei.com/ 
>>
>
> I don't see a ChangeLog mentioning that this change. Please make sure
> you accurately describe the changes (especially fixes like these).
>
> Thanks
> Suzuki
>
Hi Suzuki,

Sure, I will fill in the v13 change log.
Thanks for your comments. Any comment or suggestion is appreciated.

Best regards,
Junhao.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Junhao.
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CoreSight mailing list -- coresight@...ts.linaro.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to coresight-leave@...ts.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ