[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202211150847452601249@zte.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:47:45 +0800 (CST)
From: <guo.ziliang@....com.cn>
To: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: <tj@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<guo.ziliang@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] kernfs: use strscpy() is more robust and safer
From: guo ziliang <guo.ziliang@....com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer. That's now the
recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.
Signed-off-by: guo ziliang <guo.ziliang@....com.cn>
---
fs/kernfs/dir.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
index 77d7a3a..fbb8df4 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static struct kernfs_node *kernfs_walk_ns(struct kernfs_node *parent,
spin_lock_irq(&kernfs_pr_cont_lock);
- len = strlcpy(kernfs_pr_cont_buf, path, sizeof(kernfs_pr_cont_buf));
+ len = strscpy(kernfs_pr_cont_buf, path, sizeof(kernfs_pr_cont_buf));
if (len >= sizeof(kernfs_pr_cont_buf)) {
spin_unlock_irq(&kernfs_pr_cont_lock);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists