linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] dt-bindings: nvmem: mediatek,efuse: add MT8365 bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c119939b-0559-4a8a-e14b-92a139d64463@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:45:32 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@...libre.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] dt-bindings: nvmem: mediatek,efuse: add MT8365
 bindings

On 15/11/2022 03:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> From: Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>
> 
> Add bindings documentation for the efuse driver on MT8365 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml
> index 75e0a516e59a2..6893f2a6ea225 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
>                - mediatek,mt8192-efuse
>                - mediatek,mt8195-efuse
>                - mediatek,mt8516-efuse
> +              - mediatek,mt8365-efuse


This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.

So you ignored all my comments... awesome.

Best regards,
Krzysztof