lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:39:38 +0530
From:   Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
To:     Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>,
        Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-erofs <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] erofs/zmap.c: Bail out when no further region remains

On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:54:47 +0530, Gao Xiang wrote:
> I just wonder if we should return -EINVAL for post-EOF cases or
> IOMAP_HOLE with arbitrary length?

Since it has been observed that length can be zeroed, and we
must stop, I think we should return an error appropriately.

For a read-only filesystem, we probably don't really need to
care what's after the EOF or in unmapped regions, nothing can
be changed/extended. The definition of IOMAP_HOLE in iomap.h
says it stands for "no blocks allocated, need allocation".

Alternatively, we can return error iff the length of the
extent with holes is zero, like here.

Thanks,
Siddh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ