linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] gpiolib: consolidate GPIO lookups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfwMdN=OyauDLtOO7cZ4UybUJx4fOM8=2W_YFjZPDcAzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:26:46 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] gpiolib: consolidate GPIO lookups

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 2:07 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:19:07PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Ensure that all paths to obtain/look up GPIOD from generic
> > consumer-visible APIs go through the new gpiod_find_and_request()
> > helper, so that we can easily extend it with support for new firmware
> > mechanisms.
> >
> > The only exception is OF-specific [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node() API
> > that is still being used by a couple of drivers and will be removed as
> > soon as patches converting them to use generic fwnode/device APIs are
> > accepted.
>
> ...
>
> > +static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find_and_request(struct device *consumer,
> > +                                             struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > +                                             const char *con_id,
> > +                                             unsigned int idx,
> > +                                             enum gpiod_flags flags,
> > +                                             const char *label,
> > +                                             bool platform_lookup_allowed)
> > +{
> > +     struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> > +     unsigned long lookupflags;
> > +     int ret;
>
> > +     if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
>
> Just for the record. I haven't given my tag to this patch, because I think that
> the above check (and respective assignment above) are redundant. Even comment
> inside the below condition clarifies the point of the meaning of descriptor
> being not found. Besides that many of device property APIs designed the way
> that input fwnode can be invalid.
>
> Nevertheless, we agreed with Dmitry that this disagreement should be solved on
> maintainer's level, while it doesn't affect code functionality.
>
> The rest of the patch is fine.
>

Noted. :)

I'm fine with Dmitry's explanation. It doesn't hurt so let's go with
the author's intention.

Bart