linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remove submit label in __submit_discard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9c5d267e-d040-0e67-27fc-d6ff6e5dae25@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 09:36:06 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remove submit label in __submit_discard_cmd()

On 2022/11/15 6:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 11/12, Yangtao Li wrote:
>> Complaint from Matthew Wilcox in another similar place:
>>
>> 	"submit?  You don't submit anything at the 'submit' label.
>> 	it should be called 'skip' or something.  But I think this
>> 	is just badly written and you don't need a goto at all."
>>
>> Let's remove submit label for readability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/f2fs/segment.c | 6 ++----
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index 3654c30e0517..0a72e787c585 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -1144,13 +1144,11 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>   		if (time_to_inject(sbi, FAULT_DISCARD)) {
>>   			f2fs_show_injection_info(sbi, FAULT_DISCARD);
>>   			err = -EIO;
>> -			goto submit;
>> -		}
>> -		err = __blkdev_issue_discard(bdev,
>> +		} else
>> +			err = __blkdev_issue_discard(bdev,
>>   					SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(start),
>>   					SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(len),
>>   					GFP_NOFS, &bio);
> 
> Thanks. I added {} to meet the coding style.

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>

Thanks,

> 
>> -submit:
>>   		if (err) {
>>   			spin_lock_irqsave(&dc->lock, flags);
>>   			if (dc->state == D_PARTIAL)
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1