linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:40:49 +0800
From:   "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@...group.com>,
        John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@...cle.com>,
        "Dave Kleikamp" <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance
 optimization



On 2022/11/15 21:30, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:18:21PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>> On 2022/11/15 19:58, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 05:03:17PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
>>>> v2 --> v3:
>>>> 1. Discard patch 3 in v2, a cleanup patch.
>>>
>>> Do you plan to respin this series, addressing the various comments on v3?
>>
>> Yes, I haven't figured out where to make DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE generic.
> 
> Do we need to? I'd just go with something like 128MB, specific to arm64,
> and we can increase it later if anyone comes up with a good argument.

Okay, then v3's easy. I'll do it tomorrow. I've tried it before. 128M is enough.

> 

-- 
Regards,
  Zhen Lei