[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3TlVAgo9XSWKm1h@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:27:48 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Remi Duraffort <remi.duraffort@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: kselftest: Bad test result: from results parsing in LAVA
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:46:33PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> kselftest running on LAVA infrastures provides test results parser
> from test-definitions repository.
> which is getting "Bad test result:".
>
> I have noticed this on kernelci [1] and LKFT LAVA instances [2].
> We need to investigate and change parse_output [3] inside test-definitions.
>
> Report-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> Test results parser showing “Bad test results: “,
When reporting an issue can you please try to provide some
analysis which goes beyond the level of "I saw an error message"
- for example here it's hard to tell if you think you're seeing
an issue somewhere in your test automation system or if you're
trying to report something in the tests.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists