[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3UF87Z/a7UVThVF@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:46:59 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@...hat.com>,
Rafael Aquini <raquini@...hat.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/mm: fix incorrect file_map_count for invalid
pmd/pud
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:08:27AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 16.11.22 09:38, Liu Shixin wrote:
> > The page table check trigger BUG_ON() unexpectedly when split hugepage:
> >
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > kernel BUG at mm/page_table_check.c:119!
> > Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
> > Dumping ftrace buffer:
> > (ftrace buffer empty)
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 7 PID: 210 Comm: transhuge-stres Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3+ #748
> > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > pc : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
> > lr : page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x1c0/0x468
> > [...]
> > Call trace:
> > page_table_check_set.isra.0+0x398/0x468
> > __page_table_check_pte_set+0x160/0x1c0
> > __split_huge_pmd_locked+0x900/0x1648
> > __split_huge_pmd+0x28c/0x3b8
> > unmap_page_range+0x428/0x858
> > unmap_single_vma+0xf4/0x1c8
> > zap_page_range+0x2b0/0x410
> > madvise_vma_behavior+0xc44/0xe78
> > do_madvise+0x280/0x698
> > __arm64_sys_madvise+0x90/0xe8
> > invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0xdc/0x1d8
> > do_el0_svc+0xf4/0x3f8
> > el0_svc+0x58/0x120
> > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
> > el0t_64_sync+0x19c/0x1a0
> > [...]
> >
> > On arm64, pmd_present() will return true even if the pmd is invalid.
>
> I assume that's because of the pmd_present_invalid() check.
>
> ... I wonder why that behavior was chosen. Sounds error-prone to me.
That seems to be down to commit:
b65399f6111b03df ("arm64/mm: Change THP helpers to comply with generic MM semantics")
... apparently because Andrea Arcangelli said this was necessary in:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181017020930.GN30832@redhat.com/
... but that does see to contradict what's said in:
Documentation/mm/arch_pgtable_helpers.rst
... which just says:
pmd_present Tests a valid mapped PMD
... and it's not clear to me why this *only* applies to the PMD level.
Anshuman?
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists