| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <PAXPR04MB9185FA86AEAF112D06132CC689079@PAXPR04MB9185.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 16:00:08 +0000
From: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] net: fec: add xdp and page pool
statistics
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 8:34 AM
> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
> Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>; Andrew Lunn
> <andrew@...n.ch>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>; Daniel Borkmann
> <daniel@...earbox.net>; Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>; John
> Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>; Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; imx@...ts.linux.dev;
> kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] net: fec: add xdp and page pool statistics
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> From: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:17:48 +0000
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 9:23 AM
> > > To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
> > > Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>; Andrew Lunn
> > > <andrew@...n.ch>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric
> > > Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>;
> > > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; Alexei Starovoitov
> > > <ast@...nel.org>; Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>; Jesper
> > > Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>; John Fastabend
> > > <john.fastabend@...il.com>; Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>;
> > > netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > imx@...ts.linux.dev; kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] net: fec: add xdp and page pool
> > > statistics
>
> [...]
>
> > Did some testing with the atomic64_t counter, with the following codes
> > to update the u64 counter in the end of every NAPI poll cycle.
> >
> > @@ -1764,7 +1768,13 @@ fec_enet_rx_queue(struct net_device *ndev, int
> > budget, u16 queue_id)
> >
> > if (xdp_result & FEC_ENET_XDP_REDIR)
> > xdp_do_flush_map();
> > +#if 1
> > + if (xdp_prog) {
> > + int i;
> > + for(i = 0; i < XDP_STATS_TOTAL; i++)
> > + atomic64_add(xdp_stats[i], &rxq->stats[i]);
> > + }
> > +#endif
> > return pkt_received;
> > }
> >
> > With the codes above, the testing result is below:
> > root@...8qxpc0mek:~/bpf# ./xdpsock -i eth0
> > sock0@...0:0 rxdrop xdp-drv
> > pps pkts 1.00
> > rx 349399 1035008
> > tx 0 0
> >
> > sock0@...0:0 rxdrop xdp-drv
> > pps pkts 1.00
> > rx 349407 1384640
> > tx 0 0
> >
> > Without the atomic_add codes above, the testing result is below:
> > root@...8qxpc0mek:~/bpf# ./xdpsock -i eth0
> > sock0@...0:0 rxdrop xdp-drv
> > pps pkts 1.00
> > rx 350109 1989130
> > tx 0 0
> >
> > sock0@...0:0 rxdrop xdp-drv
> > pps pkts 1.00
> > rx 350425 2339786
> > tx 0 0
> >
> > And regarding the u32 counter solution, the testing result is below:
> > root@...8qxpc0mek:~/bpf# ./xdpsock -i eth0
> > sock0@...0:0 rxdrop xdp-drv
> > pps pkts 1.00
> > rx 361347 2637796
> > tx 0 0
> >
> > There are about 10K pkts/s difference here. Do we really want the u64
> counters?
>
> Where did those atomic64_t come from? u64_stats_t use either plain
> u64 for 32-bit platforms or local64_t for 64-bit ones. Take a look at [0] for the
> example of how x86_64 does this, it is far from atomic64_t.
The v5 patch has changed it to u64.
Thanks,
Shenwei
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shenwei
> >
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Shenwei
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Andrew
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Olek
>
> [0]
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.boo
> tlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv6.1-
> rc5%2Fsource%2Farch%2Fx86%2Finclude%2Fasm%2Flocal.h%23L31&data
> =05%7C01%7Cshenwei.wang%40nxp.com%7Caf8d6634fcfc4d77e07308dac7dfa
> 4a8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638042060598040
> 501%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL
> CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sWQ4Ts
> ayZvfs4pkCpC4tWvT51Cv89c4N6D5w2J%2FDC84%3D&reserved=0
>
> Thanks,
> Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists