linux-kernel - [PATCH printk v5 19/40] printk: console_flush_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221116162152.193147-20-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 17:27:31 +0106
From:   John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH printk v5 19/40] printk: console_flush_on_panic: use srcu console list iterator

With SRCU it is now safe to traverse the console list, even if
the console_trylock() failed. However, overwriting console->seq
when console_trylock() failed is still an issue.

Switch to SRCU iteration and document remaining issue with
console->seq.

Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
---
 kernel/printk/printk.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index b4be3b08d909..1a805ebdfe94 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -3049,21 +3049,22 @@ void console_flush_on_panic(enum con_flush_mode mode)
 	console_may_schedule = 0;
 
 	if (mode == CONSOLE_REPLAY_ALL) {
-		struct hlist_node *tmp;
 		struct console *c;
+		int cookie;
 		u64 seq;
 
 		seq = prb_first_valid_seq(prb);
-		/*
-		 * This cannot use for_each_console() because it's not established
-		 * that the current context has console locked and neither there is
-		 * a guarantee that there is no concurrency in that case.
-		 *
-		 * Open code it for documentation purposes and pretend that
-		 * it works.
-		 */
-		hlist_for_each_entry_safe(c, tmp, &console_list, node)
+
+		cookie = console_srcu_read_lock();
+		for_each_console_srcu(c) {
+			/*
+			 * If the above console_trylock() failed, this is an
+			 * unsynchronized assignment. But in that case, the
+			 * kernel is in "hope and pray" mode anyway.
+			 */
 			c->seq = seq;
+		}
+		console_srcu_read_unlock(cookie);
 	}
 	console_unlock();
 }
-- 
2.30.2