[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221116163417.GA1116723@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:34:17 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 37/39] PCI/MSI: Remove redundant msi_check() callback
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:55:14PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> All these sanity checks are now done _before_ any allocation work
> happens. No point in doing it twice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/msi/irqdomain.c | 48 --------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 48 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi/irqdomain.c
> @@ -64,51 +64,6 @@ static irq_hw_number_t pci_msi_domain_ca
> (pci_domain_nr(dev->bus) & 0xFFFFFFFF) << 27;
> }
>
> -static inline bool pci_msi_desc_is_multi_msi(struct msi_desc *desc)
> -{
> - return !desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_msix && desc->nvec_used > 1;
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * pci_msi_domain_check_cap - Verify that @domain supports the capabilities
> - * for @dev
> - * @domain: The interrupt domain to check
> - * @info: The domain info for verification
> - * @dev: The device to check
> - *
> - * Returns:
> - * 0 if the functionality is supported
> - * 1 if Multi MSI is requested, but the domain does not support it
> - * -ENOTSUPP otherwise
> - */
> -static int pci_msi_domain_check_cap(struct irq_domain *domain,
> - struct msi_domain_info *info,
> - struct device *dev)
> -{
> - struct msi_desc *desc = msi_first_desc(dev, MSI_DESC_ALL);
> -
> - /* Special handling to support __pci_enable_msi_range() */
> - if (pci_msi_desc_is_multi_msi(desc) &&
> - !(info->flags & MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI))
> - return 1;
> -
> - if (desc->pci.msi_attrib.is_msix) {
> - if (!(info->flags & MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX))
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> -
> - if (info->flags & MSI_FLAG_MSIX_CONTIGUOUS) {
> - unsigned int idx = 0;
> -
> - /* Check for gaps in the entry indices */
> - msi_for_each_desc(desc, dev, MSI_DESC_ALL) {
> - if (desc->msi_index != idx++)
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static void pci_msi_domain_set_desc(msi_alloc_info_t *arg,
> struct msi_desc *desc)
> {
> @@ -118,7 +73,6 @@ static void pci_msi_domain_set_desc(msi_
>
> static struct msi_domain_ops pci_msi_domain_ops_default = {
> .set_desc = pci_msi_domain_set_desc,
> - .msi_check = pci_msi_domain_check_cap,
> };
>
> static void pci_msi_domain_update_dom_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
> @@ -130,8 +84,6 @@ static void pci_msi_domain_update_dom_op
> } else {
> if (ops->set_desc == NULL)
> ops->set_desc = pci_msi_domain_set_desc;
> - if (ops->msi_check == NULL)
> - ops->msi_check = pci_msi_domain_check_cap;
> }
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists