[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3Uwi2lc4NDrdzML@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:48:43 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
"Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, aarcange@...hat.com,
ddutile@...hat.com, dhildenb@...hat.com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Wei W Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, at 8:13 AM, Chao Peng wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > index f3fa75649a78..975688912b8c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> > @@ -6537,6 +6537,29 @@ array field represents return values. The
> > userspace should update the return
> > values of SBI call before resuming the VCPU. For more details on
> > RISC-V SBI
> > spec refer, https://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc.
> >
> > +::
> > +
> > + /* KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT */
> > + struct {
> > + #define KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE (1 << 0)
> > + __u32 flags;
> > + __u32 padding;
> > + __u64 gpa;
> > + __u64 size;
> > + } memory;
> > +
>
> Would it make sense to also have a field for the access type (read, write,
> execute, etc)? I realize that shared <-> private conversion doesn't strictly
> need this, but it seems like it could be useful for logging failures and also
> for avoiding a second immediate fault if the type gets converted but doesn't
> have the right protection yet.
I don't think a separate field is necessary, that info can be conveyed via flags.
Though maybe we should go straight to a u64 for flags. Hmm, and maybe avoid bits
0-3 so that if/when RWX info is conveyed the flags can align with
PROT_{READ,WRITE,EXEC} and the EPT flags, e.g.
KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_READ (1 << 0)
KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_WRITE (1 << 1)
KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_EXECUTE (1 << 2)
> (Obviously, if this were changed, KVM would need the ability to report that
> it doesn't actually know the mode.)
>
> --Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists