linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: imx: imxrt1050: add IMXRT1050_CLK_LCDIF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:27:28 +0100
From:   Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com>
To:     Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Bough Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: imx: imxrt1050: add IMXRT1050_CLK_LCDIF_PIX
 clock gate

Hi Jesse,

On 15/11/22 21:43, Jesse Taube wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/15/22 14:32, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>> Cc: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com>
>> ---
>> V1->V2:
>> * nothing done
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c 
>> b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c
>> index 26108e9f7e67..39f77c03b892 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imxrt1050.c
>> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static int imxrt1050_clocks_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_USDHC2] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("usdhc2", 
>> "usdhc2_podf", ccm_base + 0x80, 4);
>>       hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_LPUART1] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("lpuart1", 
>> "lpuart_podf", ccm_base + 0x7c, 24);
>>       hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_LCDIF_APB] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("lcdif", 
>> "lcdif_podf", ccm_base + 0x70, 28);
>> +    hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_LCDIF_PIX] = imx_clk_hw_gate2("lcdif_pix", 
>> "lcdif", ccm_base + 0x74, 10);
> I think it makes sense to squash this with PATCH1 because it changes the 
> same file. It also will make the change more understandable as I swapped 
> the offsets for PIX clock and APB clock accidentally. 

I would not squash them since on "Patch 1/4" fixes something, while
"Patch 2/4" adds something.

> I'm not sure if 
> this is necessary but I think there should be a commit description. 

You're right and same goes for all patches, I keep forgetting.

Sorry for the noise.

Thank you
Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
CEO/CTO@...etti Engineering sas

> Otherwise
> Acked-by: Jesse Taube <mr.bossman075@...il.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Jesse Taube
>>       hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_DMA] = imx_clk_hw_gate("dma", "ipg", ccm_base 
>> + 0x7C, 6);
>>       hws[IMXRT1050_CLK_DMA_MUX] = imx_clk_hw_gate("dmamux0", "ipg", 
>> ccm_base + 0x7C, 7);
>>       imx_check_clk_hws(hws, IMXRT1050_CLK_END);