linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] sched/numa: add per-process numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:45:40 -0800
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>
CC:     <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        "Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] sched/numa: add per-process numa_balancing

Hi Gang Li,

If you want this to move forward, you'll likely need to include the
original To: and Cc: people. And also, any new ones who responded with
review comments. I've added here, those that I found in your v4 series
[1].

The message that I'm replying to appears to only be sent to a couple of
generic lists, and so it's going to be invisible to most of those
people.

Also, I already acked this series separately [2], before I saw the
missing Cc's.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220929064359.46932-1-ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com/

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/49ed07b1-e167-7f94-9986-8e86fb60bb09@nvidia.com/

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA