[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZ6Rq+mQ0M9vEE5p3fFhFpay1B3ixQEaqTekine=QNH+k52QA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:34:59 +0900
From: Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Amit Cohen <amcohen@...dia.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] ethtool: doc: clarify what drivers can
implement in their get_drvinfo()
On Wed. 16 Nov. 2022 at 09:30, Vincent MAILHOL
<mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr> wrote:
> On Tue. 16 Nov. 2022 at 01:28, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:52:39 +0900 Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> > SG! Good point on the doc being for the struct.
That comment just made me realize that actually, struct ethtool_ops is
also outdated:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/ethtool.h#L462
Please ignore the v4, I will send another patch to also fix the struct
ethtool_ops doc.
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
Powered by blists - more mailing lists