linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip: Kconfig: Add module support for TI inta/intr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <864juypoax.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 21:44:22 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Nicolas Frayer <nfrayer@...libre.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        khilman@...libre.com, glaroque@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip: Kconfig: Add module support for TI inta/intr

On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 18:54:58 +0000,
Nicolas Frayer <nfrayer@...libre.com> wrote:
> 
> Added module support for TI interrupt aggregator and interrupt router
> 
> Nicolas Frayer (2):
>   irqchip: Kconfig: module build support for the TI interrupt router
>     driver
>   irqchip: Kconfig: Added module build support for the TI interrupt
>     aggregator
> 
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms |  2 --
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig      | 12 +++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

How did you test that it doesn't introduce any regression due to
implicit ordering requirements that are now voided?

Please Cc the TI folks so that they can at least check this.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.