linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/12] perf test: Add 'leafloop' test workload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221116233854.1596378-6-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:38:47 -0800
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
        Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] perf test: Add 'leafloop' test workload

The leafloop workload is to run an infinite loop in the test_leaf
function.  This is needed for the ARM fp callgraph test to verify if it
gets the correct callchains.

  $ perf test -w leafloop

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c       |  1 +
 tools/perf/tests/tests.h              |  1 +
 tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build      |  3 +++
 tools/perf/tests/workloads/leafloop.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/workloads/leafloop.c

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
index 161f38476e77..0ed5ac452f6e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ static struct test_suite **tests[] = {
 static struct test_workload *workloads[] = {
 	&workload__noploop,
 	&workload__thloop,
+	&workload__leafloop,
 };
 
 static int num_subtests(const struct test_suite *t)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
index e6edfeeadaeb..86804dd6452b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
@@ -202,5 +202,6 @@ struct test_workload workload__##work = {	\
 /* The list of test workloads */
 DECLARE_WORKLOAD(noploop);
 DECLARE_WORKLOAD(thloop);
+DECLARE_WORKLOAD(leafloop);
 
 #endif /* TESTS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build
index b8964b1099c0..631596bdb2b3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/Build
@@ -2,3 +2,6 @@
 
 perf-y += noploop.o
 perf-y += thloop.o
+perf-y += leafloop.o
+
+CFLAGS_leafloop.o         = -g -O0 -fno-inline -fno-omit-frame-pointer
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workloads/leafloop.c b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/leafloop.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1bf5cc97649b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/workloads/leafloop.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include "../tests.h"
+
+/* We want to check these symbols in perf script */
+noinline void leaf(volatile int b);
+noinline void parent(volatile int b);
+
+static volatile int a;
+
+noinline void leaf(volatile int b)
+{
+	for (;;)
+		a += b;
+}
+
+noinline void parent(volatile int b)
+{
+	leaf(b);
+}
+
+static int leafloop(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
+	int c = 1;
+
+	if (argc > 0)
+		c = atoi(argv[0]);
+
+	parent(c);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_WORKLOAD(leafloop);
-- 
2.38.1.584.g0f3c55d4c2-goog