[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b462f1a-327b-4a8f-8de7-909dbad0ddf8@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:11:22 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
To: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>
CC: <andersson@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
<robimarko@...il.com>, <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: Add wait-queue handling logic
Hey Guru,
Thanks for taking time to review the series.
On 11/15/22 11:03, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> On Nov 14 2022 13:56, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
>> +static irqreturn_t qcom_scm_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct qcom_scm *scm = data;
>> + struct completion *wq_to_wake;
>> + u32 wq_ctx, flags, more_pending = 0;
>> +
>> + do {
>> + ret = scm_get_wq_ctx(&wq_ctx, &flags, &more_pending);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(scm->dev, "GET_WQ_CTX SMC call failed: %d\n", ret);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + wq_to_wake = qcom_scm_lookup_wq(scm, wq_ctx);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(wq_to_wake)) {
>> + dev_err(scm->dev, "No waitqueue found for wq_ctx %d: %ld\n",
>> + wq_ctx, PTR_ERR(wq_to_wake));
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (flags != QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ONE &&
>> + flags != QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ALL) {
>> + dev_err(scm->dev, "Invalid Flags found for wq_ctx: %u\n", flags);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + complete(wq_to_wake);
>
> Need to call complete() or complete_all() based on the flags.
with the current implementation we should get away with
just complete for now but I can add them back in the way
Bjorn wanted i.e. with the bool wake_all in the next
re-spin.
- Sibi
>
>> + } while (more_pending);
>> +
>> +out:
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists