linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: sched: Add a new sched-util-clamp.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y3ShA8SGM4PTYPLJ@debian.me>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:36:19 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>, Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan JMChen <Jonathan.JMChen@...iatek.com>,
        Hank <han.lin@...iatek.com>, Paul Bone <pbone@...illa.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: sched: Add a new sched-util-clamp.rst

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:55:47PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> > >  2.1  BUCKETS:
> > >  -------------
> > >  
> > > +.. code-block:: c
> > > +
> > >                             [struct rq]
> > >  
> > > -(bottom)                                                    (top)
> > > +  (bottom)                                                    (top)
> > >  
> > > -  0                                                          1024
> > > -  |                                                           |
> > > -  +-----------+-----------+-----------+----   ----+-----------+
> > > -  |  Bucket 0 |  Bucket 1 |  Bucket 2 |    ...    |  Bucket N |
> > > -  +-----------+-----------+-----------+----   ----+-----------+
> > > -     :           :                                   :
> > > -     +- p0       +- p3                               +- p4
> > > -     :                                               :
> > > -     +- p1                                           +- p5
> > > -     :
> > > -     +- p2
> > > +    0                                                          1024
> > > +    |                                                           |
> > > +    +-----------+-----------+-----------+----   ----+-----------+
> > > +    |  Bucket 0 |  Bucket 1 |  Bucket 2 |    ...    |  Bucket N |
> > > +    +-----------+-----------+-----------+----   ----+-----------+
> > > +       :           :                                   :
> > > +       +- p0       +- p3                               +- p4
> > > +       :                                               :
> > > +       +- p1                                           +- p5
> > > +       :
> > > +       +- p2
> > 
> > The code block above is diagram, isn't it? Thus specifying language for
> > syntax highlighting (in this case ``c``) isn't appropriate.
> 
> I could do with a helping hand here actually. I am a text only person but
> trying to follow the new rst docs; but I don't have a clue to be honest.
> 
> I did try to find the right directive, but I couldn't find it. What should be
> specified for this diagram?

Just leave ..code-block:: directive alone or use simpler double colon
(::). The highlighting will not be applied to the code snippet.

> > > @@ -200,6 +203,8 @@ The rq has a bucket for each uclamp_id: [UCLAMP_MIN, UCLAMP_MAX].
> > >  The range of each bucket is 1024/N. For example for the default value of 5 we
> > >  will have 5 buckets, each of which will cover the following range:
> > >  
> > > +.. code-block:: c
> > > +
> > 
> > Again, why ``c`` syntax highlighting?
> 
> This is a C code snippet. What would be better to use? I think I was getting
> errors if I don't specify something. But again; I was touching my way around in
> the dark here trying to figure it out.
> 

Yup, that's the correct language for highlighting.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)